August 26, 2010 4:42 pm
Harry Shearer, director of The Big Uneasy, a new film about why levees failed in New Orleans following Hurricane Katrina’s onslaught, offered a searing critique the other night about the news media and their coverage of the deadly storm.
Shearer was quoted by AOL’s DailyFinance site as saying the New York Times “did okay” in its post-Katrina coverage five years ago.
“I think the rest of the press gets a D, and probably a D-minus for their efforts at patting themselves on the back about how well they did speaking truth to power,” Shearer said in an interview Tuesday night with Jeff Bercovici, the media columnist for DailyFinance.
Shearer cited the encounter September 1, 2005, between CNN’s Anderson Cooper and U.S. Senator Mary Landrieu.
Cooper on that occasion snapped at Landrieu, telling her: “And to listen to politicians thanking each other and complimenting each other, you know, I got to tell you, there are a lot of people here who are very upset, and very angry, and very frustrated.”
Shearer said of Cooper’s tongue-lashing the senator: “Like that’s the person you need to lecture.”
Shearer was further quoted as saying: “It was grandstanding and showboating in place of telling a story–partly because they left. They left. Water leaves, story over” in post-Katrina New Orleans.
He noted that the New Orleans Times-Picayune newspaper won two Pulitzer Prizes for its Katrina-related coverage. Times-Picayune reporters “couldn’t leave,” Shearer said. “They lived there. They had to stay.”
So, a “D” or “D-minus” overall for post-Katrina coverage? Harsh grades, those.
But certainly not undeserved.
News reporting in the immediate aftermath of Katrina’s landfall represented “no high, heroic aftermath in American journalism,” I write in Getting It Wrong, my new book debunking 10 prominent media-driven myths–among them the myth of superlative reporting in Katrina’s aftermath.
“The coverage,” I write, “was in important respects flawed and exaggerated. On crucial details, journalists erred badly, and got it wrong.”
I further write:
“They reported snipers firing at medical personnel. They reported that shots were fired at helicopters, halting evacuations from the Convention Center [in New Orleans].
“They told of bodies being stacked there like cordwood. They reported roving gangs were preying on tourists and terrorizing the occupants of the Superdome, raping and killing. They said children were victims of sexual assault, that one seven-year-old was raped and her throat was slit. They reported that sharks were plying the flooded streets of New Orleans.”
In the end, none of those reports was verified or substantiated, I note.
I point out in Getting It Wrong that no single news organization committed all those errors. And not all those lapses were committed at the same time, although they were largely concentrated during the first days of September 2005.
In any case, I write, the erroneous and over-the-top reporting “had the cumulative the effect of painting for America and the rest of the world a scene of surreal violence and terror, something straight out of Mad Max or Lord of the Flies.”
Estimates of Katrina’s death toll in New Orleans also were wildly exaggerated.
U.S. Senator David Vitter, a Louisiana Republican, said on September 2, 2005, that fatalities in the state could reach 10,000 or more.
Vitter described his estimate as “only a guess,” but it was nonetheless taken up by the then-New Orleans mayor, Ray Nagin, and reported widely.
In all, the death toll in Louisiana from Katrina was around 1,500.
About the inaccurate estimates of fatalities, the Times of London said it had become clear by in mid-September 2005 “that 10,000 people could have died only if more than 90 per cent of them had locked themselves into their homes, chained themselves to heavy furniture and chosen to drown instead of going upstairs as the waters rose.”
But the Times rationalized the flawed reporting, suggesting that it was inevitable: When “nature and the 24-hour news industry collide, hyperbole results.”
A weak excuse, that. Besides, post-Katrina reporting from New Orleans was more than hyperbolic: It described apocalyptic horrors that the hurricane supposedly unleashed.
“D-minus” is none too generous.
Related:
H/T Jim Romenesko
Many thanks to Instapundit Glenn Reynolds for linking to this post
Posted by W. Joseph Campbell
Categories: Anniversaries, Debunking, Hurricane Katrina, Media myths
Tags: Debunking, Disaster coverage, Fact-checking, Getting It Wrong, Hurricane Katrina, Media-driven myths
Mobile Site | Full Site
Get a free blog at WordPress.com Theme: WordPress Mobile Edition by Alex King.
[…] 27, 2010 at 11:27 am The Nation offered yesterday an incisive assessment of the news media’s coverage of post-Katrina New Orleans that was as thoughtful as any I’ve seen amid the indulgence in “anniversary […]
By Mainstream media ‘fractured’ in covering Katrina « Media Myth Alert on August 27, 2010 at 11:27 am
[…] MORE ON KATRINA: Media Myths: Give The Press A D- On Post-Katrina Coverage. […]
By Instapundit » Blog Archive » MORE ON KATRINA: Media Myths: Give The Press A D- On Post-Katrina Coverage…. on August 29, 2010 at 8:03 am
[…] his blog, Media Myth Alert, Campbell added no single news organization committed all those errors. And not all those lapses […]
By Flashback: After Katrina, Sensationalistic Media Accounts Earned Press a D-Minus on August 30, 2010 at 10:00 am
[…] Little of it was true. […]
By Absent in looking back: Katrina’s lessons for the press « Media Myth Alert on August 31, 2010 at 6:06 am
[…] Katrina and the myth of superlative reporting In Anniversaries, Debunking, Hurricane Katrina, Media myths, Newspapers on September 1, 2010 at 7:34 am Five years ago this month, a few weeks after Hurricane Katrina battered the Gulf Coast and left much of New Orleans under water, former CBS anchorman Dan Rather went on Larry King Live to extol television’s coverage of the deadly storm. […]
By Katrina and the myth of superlative reporting « Media Myth Alert on September 1, 2010 at 7:45 am
[…] Watergate scandal, with Edward R. Murrow and his 1954 program on Senator Joseph McCarthy, and with coverage of Hurricane Katrina’s aftermath in […]
By ‘Getting It Wrong’ on WTIC talk radio « Media Myth Alert on September 12, 2010 at 11:39 am
[…] Driscoll said that the chapters of Getting It Wrong “have a sort of curious” set of bookends, in that they begin with a discussion of William Randolph Hearst’s famous vow to “furnish the war” with Spain and end with a look at the exaggerated, over-the-top coverage of Hurricane Katrina’s aftermath. […]
By ‘Getting It Wrong’ goes on ‘PJM Political’ « Media Myth Alert on October 10, 2010 at 10:25 am
[…] of Hurricane Katrina‘s aftermath in 2005 was marked by superlative reporting; in fact, the Katrina coverage was marred by inaccuracies and wildly exaggerated reports of mayhem and unspeakable […]
By ‘Getting It Wrong’ among 90 titles at NPC Book Fair « Media Myth Alert on November 8, 2010 at 11:56 am
[…] installment also includes a discussion about the flawed and over-the-top news coverage of Hurricane Katrina‘s aftermath in […]
By Media myths send ‘misleading’ message of media power « Media Myth Alert on November 13, 2010 at 9:43 am
[…] observation is reminiscent of excuses offered for the highly exaggerated, over-the-top reporting about mayhem and violence in New Orleans in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina in 2005. […]
By Thoughts on why journalists can get it badly wrong « Media Myth Alert on November 27, 2010 at 6:34 am
[…] lessons tend to remain unlearned, however — as was apparent in the highly exaggerated news reports about violence and mayhem that supposedly swept New Orleans in the immediate aftermath of Hurricane […]
By A fiasco for the press, too: Error, hype marked Bay of Pigs reporting « Media Myth Alert on April 15, 2011 at 6:12 am
[…] Give press ‘D-minus’ on post-Katrina coverage […]
By A cautionary note on early coverage of dramatic events « Media Myth Alert on May 3, 2011 at 8:18 am
[…] News coverage of Katrina’s aftermath in New Orleans in early September 2005 was marred by wild exaggerations about extreme, Mad Max-like […]
By ‘Getting It Wrong’ wins SPJ award for Research about Journalism « Media Myth Alert on May 10, 2011 at 9:05 am
[…] Give the press ‘D-minus’ on post-Katrina coverage […]
By The enduring appeal for journalists of the would-be apocalyptic « Media Myth Alert on May 16, 2011 at 6:59 am
[…] helps explain the myth of superlative reporting that marred the coverage of the immediate aftermath of Hurricane Katrina’s landfall in late summer […]
By Media myths, the ‘comfort food’ of journalism « Media Myth Alert on May 25, 2011 at 4:52 am
[…] Bernstein for the Washington Post brought down Richard Nixon’s presidency) and the woefully exaggerated reporting that characterized coverage of Hurricane Katrina’s aftermath in New […]
By ‘Getting It Wrong’ at ‘Reader’s Corner’ tonight « Media Myth Alert on June 24, 2011 at 6:06 am
[…] us to explain what leaders must do to avoid the mistakes that were made six years ago” when Hurricane Katrina battered the Gulf […]
By Not a joke: Ray Nagin asked for advice on hurricane prep « Media Myth Alert on August 28, 2011 at 2:42 am
[…] Give the press ‘D-minus’ on post-Katrina coverage […]
By Talking media myths on ‘Community Voices’ « Media Myth Alert on September 3, 2011 at 3:16 pm
[…] It Wrong revisits the badly flawed news reporting of Hurricane Katrina’s assault on New Orleans in 2005 — which offers enduring if unlearned lessons for journalists about the […]
By Slow to learn: Lesson for journos in Brian Ross’ egregious error on ABC « Media Myth Alert on July 20, 2012 at 5:17 pm
[…] Give the press ‘D-minus’ on post-Katrina coverage […]
By Social-media triumphalism and its myth-busting limits « Media Myth Alert on October 31, 2012 at 3:50 pm
[…] tendency was quite apparent in the aftermath of the exaggerated reporting of the mayhem Hurricane Katrina supposedly unleashed in New Orleans in […]
By Little sustained media reflection two weeks after botched massacre coverage « Media Myth Alert on December 28, 2012 at 11:30 am
[…] turn the event into an actual carnival. Billy Wilder never heard of Baby Jessica, O.J Simpson, or Hurricane Katrina, but he already understood how American media would cover these phenomena, and how the viewing […]
By How the Circus Got to Town: “Ace in the Hole” and the disastrous potential of American reinvention | The Liminal Space on May 27, 2013 at 9:42 pm
[…] and topping that list was coverage of the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, followed by the reporting of the Hurricane Katrina disaster in 2005 and of the O.J. Simpson not-guilty verdicts in […]
By Cronkite report on Vietnam was ‘most influential TV show ever’? | Media Myth Alert on June 18, 2013 at 10:41 am
[…] Give the press D-minus on post-Katrina coverage […]
By 10 years on: News media shy from revisiting flawed Katrina coverage | Media Myth Alert on August 25, 2015 at 1:23 pm
[…] myths can feed stereotypes, too. The highly exaggerated news reports of nightmarish violence in New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina’s landfall in 2005 […]
By Media myths: FAQs, Part Two | Media Myth Alert on January 13, 2017 at 2:18 pm
[…] D-minus was a grade none too severe for the post-Katrina coverage. […]
By For the media, Harvey was no Katrina redux; here’s why | Media Myth Alert on September 2, 2017 at 10:58 am
[…] Give the press D-minus on post-Katrina coverage […]
By Afghanistan is ‘Biden’s Katrina’? Afghanistan is dramatically worse | Media Myth Alert on August 27, 2021 at 10:13 am
[…] It is true that New Orleans in Katrina’s wake conjured comparisons to a war zone. The dominant media narrative in late summer 2005 told of mayhem and unimaginable horror that supposedly had been unleashed across the flooded city.Give the press D-minus on post-Katrina coverage […]
By Afghanistan is ‘Biden’s Katrina’? Afghanistan is dramatically worse – W. Joseph Campbell on August 28, 2021 at 3:42 pm