W. Joseph Campbell

, , , , , ,

A sort-of correction from the NYTimes

In Debunking, Error, New York Times, Photographs on August 28, 2012 at 9:09 pm

‘Napalm girl,’ 1972 (Nick Ut/AP)

It has taken more than three months, but the New York Times today published a sort-of correction of its erroneous description about the napalm attack in Vietnam in June 1972 that preceded the famous photograph of children terrified and wounded by the bombing.

The photograph, taken by Nick Ut of the Associated Press, won a Pulitzer Prize in 1973. It is colloquially known as the “napalm girl” image.

The Times’ error appeared in an obituary, published May 14, about Horst Faas, an award-winning AP photographer and editor who spent years in Vietnam.

The obituary said the photograph showed “the aftermath of one of the thousands of bombings in the countryside by American planes: a group of terror-stricken children fleeing the scene, a girl in the middle of the group screaming and naked, her clothes incinerated by burning napalm.”

But as I, and others, pointed out to the Times, the napalm was not dropped by the American military but by the South Vietnamese Air Force.

In response to my email sent in May about that lapse, the Times’ correction expert on its obituary staff, Peter Keepnews, wrote:

“You are correct that the bombing in question was conducted by the South Vietnamese Air Force. However, the obituary referred only to ‘American planes,’ and there does not seem to be any doubt that this plane was American –- a Douglas A-1 Skyraider, to be precise.”

Of course, the aircraft’s manufacturer was hardly at issue. And in the sort-of correction published today, the Times removed the reference to “American planes” in the digital version of the obituary but otherwise embraced Keepnews’ convoluted reasoning, stating:

“While the planes that carried out that attack were ‘American planes’ in the sense that they were made in the United States, they were flown by the South Vietnamese Air Force, not by American forces.”

Which makes for a less-than-clean correction.

Indeed, the correction seems begrudging, half-hearted.

And less than sincere.

It’s as if the Times were saying the South Vietnamese Air Force was doing the dirty work for the American military — which by June 1972 was decidedly winding down its war effort in Vietnam.

Richard Pyle, a retired veteran AP correspondent who was the news agency’s Saigon bureau chief from 1970-73, characterized the Times’ correction this way:

“[T]he phrasing — ‘while the planes that carried out the attack were “American planes” in the sense that they were made in the United States, they were flown by the South Vietnamese Air Force, not American forces’ — makes it sound like a bunch of teenagers borrowing daddy’s car.”

Indeed.

Pyle, who retired from AP in 2009, also had petitioned the Times for a correction in the Faas obituary. So had Hal Buell, a retired AP vice president who for years directed the news agency’s photo service.

In July, they sent a joint letter by email to the Times, pointing to the very real prospect that the error, if left uncorrected, could solidify into wide acceptance.

They wrote: “Our larger concern, beyond amending the immediate record, is that if left standing, this error will be repeated in future by the Times and any publications that might rely on it as a source, in effect causing a significant piece of misinformation to be cast in journalistic stone.”

The Times’ sort-of correction muddies rather than clarifies or fully corrects. The concerns that Pyle and Buell addressed are hardly set to rest.

The sort-of correction is disappointing, too, in light of the praise that the Times’ outgoing public editor, Arthur Brisbane, offered Sunday about the newspaper’s corrections staff.

Brisbane extolled the Times’ corrections desk as “a powerful engine of accountability” unmatched by similar operations at other U.S. news organizations.

The sort-of correction published today mocks such extravagant praise.

WJC

Many thanks to Instapundit
Glenn Reynolds for linking to this post

Recent or related:

  1. […] (8/29): The NYT belatedly, half-heartedly corrects. They stick with the it-was-an-American-plane-because-Americans-built-it argument, but at least […]

    Pravda « Internet Scofflaw 29 August 2012 at 10am

  2. […] A sort-of correction from the NYTimes « Media Myth Alert. Share this:TwitterRedditFacebookEmailPrintDiggStumbleUponLike this:LikeBe the first to like this. This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink. ← The welfare issue is back | The Daily Caller […]

    A sort-of correction from the NYTimes « Media Myth Alert | jamesbbkk 29 August 2012 at 7pm

  3. […] A sort-of correction from the NYTimes « Media Myth Alert. Share this:TwitterRedditFacebookEmailPrintDiggStumbleUponLike this:LikeBe the first to like this. This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink. ← The welfare issue is back | The Daily Caller […]

    A sort-of correction from the NYTimes « Media Myth Alert | jamesbbkk 29 August 2012 at 7pm

  4. […] next day, the Times issues a “sort-of correction,” that didn’t make those who complained about it—including a retired AP correspondent—happy. […]

    Sort-of corrections | Hoystory 3 September 2012 at 7pm

  5. […] database search of leading U.S. newspapers — including the New York Times, the Washington Post, Chicago Tribune, Los Angeles Times, and Baltimore Sun — turned up […]

    Recalling George Romney’s ‘brainwashing’ — and Gene McCarthy’s ‘light rinse’ retort « Media Myth Alert 4 September 2012 at 3pm

  11. […] recently, in his farewell column in August, Arthur Brisbane, the New York Times public editor (or ombudsman), chided the newspaper’s “political and cultural […]

    ‘We’re trying to toughen you up’: Never happened with Obama and news media « Media Myth Alert 7 October 2012 at 8am

  15. […] Times resisted doing so until late August, when it issued a sort-of correction that embraced Keepnews’ tortured reasoning and […]

    Taking stock: Top mythbusting posts of 2012 « Media Myth Alert 30 December 2012 at 6am

  17. […] “stalemate” was an unremarkable way of describing the war effort in Vietnam. The New York Times, for example, had invoked “stalemate” months before Cronkite’s television report, […]

    On media myths and hallowed moments of exaggerated importance | Media Myth Alert 23 February 2014 at 7am

  18. […] A sort-of correction from the New York Times […]

    Exaggerating the power of ‘napalm girl’ photo | Media Myth Alert 29 May 2014 at 8am

  19. […] A sort-of correction from the New York Times […]

    What was Rush Limbaugh talking about? | Media Myth Alert 13 September 2014 at 4pm

  20. […] Times resisted for weeks before publishing an obscure sort-of correction that embraced Keepnews’ tortured reasoning and […]

    Marking five years: The best of Media Myth Alert | Media Myth Alert 31 October 2014 at 12pm

  21. […] search of a full-text database of leading U.S. newspapers — including the New York Times, the Washington Post, Chicago Tribune, Los Angeles Times, and Baltimore Sun — turned up no […]

    Five years on: The best of Media Myth Alert, Part II | Media Myth Alert 31 October 2014 at 1pm

  22. […] the Times would do well to offer a correction or clarification: The Cronkite-Johnson tale certainly is “oft-cited,” but it is more […]

    Disputed? Use it anyway: NYTimes invokes Cronkite-Johnson myth | Media Myth Alert 24 January 2015 at 9am

  25. […] the myth of U.S. culpability in the napalm attack soon took hold, and has proven extremely durable. A few weeks ago, for example, the Los Angeles Times declared the naked girl at the center of the […]

    No, ‘Forbes’: It wasn’t ‘an American napalm attack’ | Media Myth Alert 11 September 2016 at 12pm

  29. […] The fight at Trang Bang was — as I point out in the new edition of my media-mythbusting book, Getting It Wrong — “an all-Vietnamese encounter.” The notion that U.S. warplanes dropped the napalm that burned Kim Phuc and others is false, but  enduring. […]

    In essay about fake news, ‘Vox’ offers up media myth of the ‘Napalm Girl’ | Media Myth Alert 6 July 2017 at 9pm

  30. […] The notion that U.S. warplanes dropped the napalm that burned the girl and others is false, but enduring. […]

    Taking stock: Top mythbusting posts of 2017 | Media Myth Alert 26 December 2017 at 5pm

  33. […] and even biases; to seek more vigorously to get it right; to correct errors promptly and without chafing, to be less lop-sided, and less condescending, in their […]

    A week after the editorial solidarity stunt: Why nothing changed in Trump-press war | Media Myth Alert 21 August 2018 at 1pm

  34. […] and biases; to undertake more vigorously to get it right; to correct errors promptly and without chafing, to be less lop-sided, and less condescending, in their […]

    A week after the editorial solidarity stunt: Why nothing changed in Trump-press war | Media Myth Alert 23 August 2018 at 6am

  35. […] optimism was dashed not long after the anniversary when the New York Times published a commentary asserting that the “Halloween eve radio dramatization of H.G. Wells’s […]

    Taking stock: Top mythbusting posts of 2018 | Media Myth Alert 27 December 2018 at 10am

  37. […] the will or interest to investigate suspicions of election anomalies and fraud. After all, the New York Times and Washington Post did share a Pulitzer Prize for their reporting on vague suspicions that Trump […]

    Taking stock: Top mythbusting posts of 2020 | Media Myth Alert 30 December 2020 at 9pm

Comments are closed.