W. Joseph Campbell

, , , ,

That awesome ‘Cronkite Moment’

In Cronkite Moment, Debunking, Media myths on January 13, 2010 at 11:44 am

The power of the so-called “Cronkite Moment” knows few bounds.

A column in a Florida newspaper the other day claims that the “Cronkite Moment” was “seminal” because “many say” it “marked the end of the media’s reputation for credibility.”

The occasion was February 27, 1968, when CBS News anchorman Walter Cronkite pronounced that the U.S. war effort in Vietnam had become mired in stalemate. Cronkite suggested that negotiations with the communist North Vietnamese should be considered, as a way to end the conflict.

Cronkite’s analysis was supposedly so powerful and insightful that President Lyndon Johnson purportedly told an aide or aides:

“If I’ve lost Cronkite, I’ve lost Middle America.” Or words to that effect.

Johnson in 1968

The column in the Hernando Today newspaper, a publication of the Tampa Tribune, doesn’t invoke Johnson’s purported remarks — which, as MediaMythAlert has noted several times, Johnson almost certainly did not say.

The column does, though, say that Cronkite’s remarks “turned the tide of American public opinion and influenced Lyndon Johnson not to seek reelection.”

Nope. Not so.

As I discuss in my forthcoming book, Getting It Wrong,  “there is scant evidence that the Cronkite program had much influence at all on American popular opinion about the war.” As I further write in the book, which is to be published in the summer by University of California Press:

“Polling data clearly show that American sentiment had begun shifting months before the Cronkite program.”

Indeed, those data indicate that Americans’ views about the war had begun to shift months before the Cronkite program.

Journalists at the time also detected a softening in support of the war.

In December 1967, for example, Don Oberdorfer, then a national correspondent for the Knight newspapers, noted that “summer and fall of 1967 [had] been a time of switching, when millions of American voters—along with many religious leaders, editorial writers and elected officials—appeared to be changing their views about the war.”

As for Johnson’s decision not to seek reelection, the Cronkite program had little or no effect.

Critical to Johnson’s decision, which he announced at the end of March 1968, was the advice and counsel of his advisers, and the implications of Senator Eugene McCarthy’s insurgent bid for the Democratic nomination for president.

The surprising potency of McCarthy’s antiwar campaign was demonstrated in the Democratic primary election in New Hampshire on March 12, 1968. McCarthy won 42 percent of the vote, a far greater portion than expected. Johnson won 49 percent.

Not only that, there is evidence that Johnson never intended to seek reelection in 1968.

In any event, Cronkite  used to scoff at the notion that his report of February 27, 1968, had a powerful influence on Johnson. Rather, he would say, the effect was like that of “a very small straw.”

Near the end of his life, however, Cronkite (who died in July 2009) came to embrace the supposed power of the broadcast.

“To be honest,” he told Esquire magazine in 2006: “I was rather amazed that my reporting from Vietnam had such an effect on history.”

But it didn’t, though. Not really.

WJC

  1. […] I noted in a recent post, the “Cronkite Moment” knows few bounds. It supposedly “turned the tide of American […]

    Another twist to the ‘Cronkite Moment’ « Media Myth Alert 21 January 2010 at 11pm

  2. […] commentary that night has become the stuff of legend. But it was scarcely so powerful or decisive as to much move public […]

    Myth resurfaces in Cronkite-collaborator report « Media Myth Alert 15 May 2010 at 10am

  3. […] it is with the purported “Cronkite moment” of 1968, when CBS anchorman Walter Cronkite asserted in a special televised report that the […]

    On version variability and the ‘Cronkite moment’ « Media Myth Alert 25 May 2010 at 10am

  6. […] commentary invoked what often is called the “Cronkite Moment” in […]

    ‘Lyndon Johnson went berserk’? Not because of Cronkite « Media Myth Alert 21 July 2010 at 1pm

  7. […] on August 1, 2010 at 8:33 am The long reach and international appeal of the mythical “Cronkite Moment“–when in 1968 the words of Walter Cronkite supposedly altered U.S. war policy in […]

    Long reach of the ‘Cronkite Moment’ « Media Myth Alert 1 August 2010 at 9am

  8. […] at 10:08 am In his column this week, Al Neuharth, founder of USA Today, invokes the dubious “Cronkite Moment” of 1968 and suggests an outspoken television journalist today could help end the U.S. […]

    Mythical ‘Cronkite Moment’ invoked in ‘USA Today’ « Media Myth Alert 21 August 2010 at 10am

  9. […] Obama’s fallen popularity is of but passing and academic interest to Media Myth Alert. Far more intriguing is this latest affirmation of the casual yet confident use of the “Cronkite Moment.” […]

    ‘Cronkite Moment’ makes ‘Best of the Web’ « Media Myth Alert 11 September 2010 at 8am

  11. […] in a special report broadcast February 27, 1968, asserted that the U.S. military effort against the communist North […]

    On Cronkite, Jon Stewart, and ‘the most trusted man’ « Media Myth Alert 31 October 2010 at 11am

  12. […] Journal‘s “Best of the Web” online feature yesterday invoked the mythical “Cronkite Moment” of 1968, recalling it as “the oft-told story of President Johnson lamenting, ‘If […]

    Mythical ‘Cronkite Moment’ is ‘believed because it’s believable’ « Media Myth Alert 2 November 2010 at 5pm

  13. […] war there.” And on the left it’s an example of telling truth to power, and how Walter Cronkite was able to pierce … the nonsense, and make it clear to the Johnson administration that the […]

    Media myths send ‘misleading’ message of media power « Media Myth Alert 13 November 2010 at 9am

  14. […] is, Olbermann got it wrong in the two history lessons he cited–the mythical “Cronkite Moment” of 1968 and the Murrow-McCarthy encounter of […]

    Media history with Olbermann: Wrong and wrong « Media Myth Alert 17 November 2010 at 7am

  15. […] course Cronkite’s report on Vietnam had no such effect on […]

    Newsman tells ‘a simple truth,’ changes history « Media Myth Alert 21 November 2010 at 2pm

  16. […] in fact, Johnson wasn’t in front of a television set that night. He didn’t see the Cronkite program when it […]

    Murrow, Cronkite myths cited in Poland’s top paper « Media Myth Alert 4 January 2011 at 10am

  18. […] A commentary posted yesterday at the online site of the Minneapolis Star Tribune offered such a comparison, unfavorably comparing CBS News anchor Katie Couric to the venerable Walter Cronkite. […]

    What a Rash remark: ‘If I’ve lost Cronkite, I’ve….’ « Media Myth Alert 2 April 2011 at 7am

  19. […] with Cronkite? In fact, Cronkite was following rather than leading American public opinion on the […]

    Expansive claims for a mythical ‘moment’ « Media Myth Alert 24 October 2011 at 8am

  21. […] should emphasize truth-seeking rather than impartiality in their reporting, and invoked the “Cronkite Moment” to support that […]

    What ‘lesson’ from Cronkite? « Media Myth Alert 23 November 2011 at 8am

  22. […] In no way was the “Cronkite Moment” anything approaching a turning point. American public opinion notably had clearly begun shifting against the war by fall 1967, months before the Cronkite report on Vietnam. […]

    Cronkite biographer on the ‘Cronkite Moment’: A bit muddled « Media Myth Alert 20 May 2012 at 8am

  23. […] evidence that the mythical “Cronkite Moment” was of minor consequence is compelling and […]

    A glowing, hagiographic treatment of the ‘Cronkite Moment’ « Media Myth Alert 31 May 2012 at 8am

  24. […] Not only that, but U.S. public opinion had grown dubious about the war long before the presumptive “Cronkite Moment.” […]

    Further reason to pan Aaron Sorkin’s ‘Newsroom’: It embraces media myths « Media Myth Alert 26 June 2012 at 6am

  25. […] discusses in detail the so-called “Cronkite Moment” of February 27, 1968, when Cronkite’s on-air assessment that the Vietnam War was […]

    ‘Getting It Wrong’ receives major shout-out in ‘New Yorker’ « Media Myth Alert 5 July 2012 at 1pm

  26. […] la manera de salir del pantano”. Aquella exhortación ha llegado a ser conocida como el “Momento Cronkite” y fue supuestamente tan intensa y profunda que provocó un punto de inflexión y cambio en […]

    Newsroom: o la búsqueda cándida de rehabilitar el Cuarto Poder | El Quinto Poder 7 September 2012 at 3pm

  27. […] la manera de salir del pantano”. Aquella exhortación ha llegado a ser conocida como el “Momento Cronkite” y fue supuestamente tan intensa y profunda que provocó un punto de inflexión y cambio en […]

    Newsroom: o la búsqueda cándida de rehabilitar el cuarto poder | Desgobierno de Chile 7 September 2012 at 3pm

  28. […] la manera de salir del pantano”. Aquella exhortación ha llegado a ser conocida como el “Momento Cronkite” y fue supuestamente tan intensa y profunda que provocó un punto de inflexión y cambio en […]

    Newsroom o la búsqueda cándida de rehabilitar el cuarto poder | Desgobierno de Chile 7 September 2012 at 10pm

  30. […] years, journalists have sought to attach great significance to Cronkite’s assessment, even though it was thoroughly unoriginal and of little demonstrable […]

    Taking stock: Top mythbusting posts of 2012 « Media Myth Alert 30 December 2012 at 6am

  31. […] more, there’s no evidence that Cronkite’s “mired in stalemate” comment influenced public opinion “massively” or […]

    Oprah as ‘this generation’s Walter Cronkite’? « Media Myth Alert 13 January 2013 at 3pm

  33. […] age” fallacy and invokes media myths about prominent broadcast journalists Walter Cronkite and Edward R. […]

    Embracing media myths — and the ‘golden age’ fallacy | Media Myth Alert 3 January 2014 at 12pm

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: