“Yellow journalism” is an evocative sneer that has morphed over the decades.
The term these days is sometimes invoked as an off-hand description for sensational treatment of the news. Or, more broadly, it’s used to describe egregious journalistic misconduct of almost any kind.
Or, as AlterNet blog noted in a post yesterday, “sometimes, yellow journalism is seen as synonymous with [William Randolph] Hearst, himself.”
But that’s really an imprecise characterization of a robust genre practiced by Hearst and others in the late 19th century.
As I wrote in my 2001 book, Yellow Journalism: Puncturing the Myths, Defining the Legacies, yellow journalism was defined by these features and characteristics:
- the frequent use of multicolumn headlines that sometimes stretched across the front page.
- a variety of topics reported on the front page, including news of politics, war, international diplomacy, sports, and society.
- the generous and imaginative use of illustrations, including photographs and other graphic representations such as locator maps.
- bold and experimental layouts, including those in which one report and illustration would dominate the front page. Such layouts sometimes were enhanced by the use of color.
- a tendency to rely on anonymous sources, particularly in dispatches of leading reporters.
- a penchant for self-promotion, to call attention frequently to the newspaper’s accomplishments. This tendency was notably evident in crusades against monopolies and municipal corruption.
Given those defining features, I wrote in Yellow Journalism that the genre “certainly could not be called predictable, boring, or uninspired—complaints of the sort that are frequently raised about U.S. newspapers of the early twenty-first century.”
Moreover, yellow journalism of a century or more ago was often criticized–but its salient features, including its bold typography, were often emulated. As such, it exerted a powerful influence in American journalism of the late 19th and early 20th centuries.
So it was much more than merely sensational.
But largely due to its association with Hearst–a toxic personality who ran the New York Journal and later turned the newspaper into a platform for a succession of failed campaigns for high public office–“yellow journalism” has mutated into the caricature that’s commonplace today.
The AlterNet post, which assails Rupert Murdoch and his recent $1 million donation to the Republicans, also says “yellow journalism” was “originally coined to describe the journalistic practices of Joseph Pulitzer….”
Not so.
As I discuss in Yellow Journalism, the epithet was devised in early 1897 to impugn the journalism of both Pulitzer and Hearst.
“Yellow journalism” first appeared in print in the New York Press, which was edited by the austere Ervin Wardman, who once was described as revealing his “Calvinistic ancestry in every line of his face.”
The term appeared in Wardman’s newspaper on January 31, 1897, and quickly caught on, as a way to denigrate what then was called the “new journalism” of Hearst’s Journal and of Pulitzer‘s New York World. By the end of March 1897, references to “yellow journalism” had appeared in newspapers in Providence, Richmond, and San Francisco.
A sneer thus had been born.
Precisely how Wardman and the Press landed on “yellow journalism” is not clear, however.
As I note in Yellow Journalism, the newspaper’s own brief discussion of the term’s origins was vague and unrevealing: “We called them Yellow because they are Yellow,” it said in 1898 about the Journal and the World.
In the 1890s, the color yellow sometimes was associated with depraved literature, which may have been an inspiration to the Harvard-educated Wardman, who plainly despised Hearst and Pulitzer, and editorially supported an ill-fated boycott of their newspapers in New York City in 1897.
Related:
[…] Getting it right about ‘yellow journalism’ […]
[…] Getting it right about yellow journalism […]
[…] Getting it right about yellow journalism […]
[…] Getting it right about yellow journalism […]
[…] Getting it right about ‘yellow journalism’ […]
[…] Getting it right about yellow journalism […]
[…] Getting it right about yellow journalism […]
[…] Getting it right about yellow journalism […]
[…] A humanitarian disaster had taken hold in Cuba by early 1898, and the harsh effects of Spain’s “reconcentration” policy were often described in U.S. newspapers, including Hearst’s yellow press. […]
[…] Getting it right about yellow journalism […]
[…] Getting it right about yellow journalism […]
[…] having provoked “an atrocious Anarchistic assault on the President” and declared that yellow journalism had “graduated into a serious and studied propaganda of social […]
[…] “Yellow journalism” became a recognizable, even bold genre in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. […]
[…] to the historically incorrect view that the overheated content of William Randolph Hearst’s yellow press brought about the Spanish-American War in […]
[…] “Yellow journalism” quickly caught on, as a sneer to denigrate what then was called the “new journalism” of the New York Journal of William Randolph Hearst and the New York World of Joseph Pulitzer. By the end of March 1897, references to “yellow journalism” had appeared in newspapers in Providence, Richmond, and San Francisco. […]
[…] leading practitioner of yellow journalism, William Randolph Hearst, turned his newspapers into a platform for his mostly unfulfilled […]
[…] was the leading practitioner of yellow journalism, or what he called the “journalism of action,” which embraced an activist vision for American […]
[…] honorees haven’t come very far” — is risible. The preceding claim about the yellow press and a “stampede” to war with Spain is utterly […]
[…] Getting it right about ‘yellow journalism’ […]
[…] Getting it right about ‘yellow journalism’ […]
[…] CounterPunch claimed the tough old media mogul has “surpassed William Randolph Hearst,” press baron of the 19th and early 20th centuries, “in practicing yellow journalism.” […]
[…] addressing such a dubious assertion as Hearst’s yellow press “fomented the Spanish-American War,” it’s useful to ask: How’d they do it? […]
[…] fought over Spain’s harsh rule of Cuba, a conflict often but inaccurately blamed on the yellow press of William Randolph […]
[…] Getting it right about yellow journalism […]
[…] Getting it right about yellow journalism […]
[…] Getting it right about ‘yellow journalism’ […]
[…] Getting it right about ‘yellow journalism’ […]
[…] Getting it right about ‘yellow journalism’ […]
[…] Getting it right about ‘yellow journalism’ […]
[…] 130 years old that makes few waves these days. No one thinks of it as a latter-day repository of ‘yellow journalism,’” says media scholar W. Joseph Campbell. Otis Chandler likewise steered the Los Angeles Times […]
[…] 130 years old that makes few waves these days. No one thinks of it as a latter-day repository of ‘yellow journalism,’” says media scholar W. Joseph Campbell. Otis Chandler likewise steered the Los Angeles […]
[…] years old that makes few waves these days. No one thinks of it as a latter-day repository of ‘yellow journalism,’” says media scholar W. Joseph Campbell. Otis Chandler likewise steered the Los […]
[…] 130 years old that makes few waves these days. No one thinks of it as a latter-day repository of ‘yellow journalism,’” says media scholar W. Joseph Campbell. Otis Chandler likewise steered the Los Angeles Times […]
[…] Getting it right about yellow journalism […]
[…] the most controversial and poorly understood periods in American media history — the rise of yellow journalism and the at-times exaggerated reporting of the Spanish-American War and its antecedent […]
[…] of the most controversial and poorly understood periods in American media history — the rise of yellow journalism and the at-times exaggerated reporting of the Spanish-American War and its antecedent […]