W. Joseph Campbell

, , , , , , , , ,

The ‘newsroom where two reporters took down a president’? Sure it was

In Debunking, Error, Media myths, Scandal, Washington Post, Watergate myth on February 2, 2013 at 7:58 am

News that the Washington Post is exploring the sale of its headquarters building inevitably stirred reminders of the Watergate scandal, supposedly the newspaper’s most memorable exposé.

The Wall Street Journal makes that link in an article today while credulously invoking the heroic-journalist myth of Watergate, the scandal that forced Richard Nixon to resign the presidency in 1974.

wapo-logo“The Washington, D.C., newsroom where two reporters took down a president may soon be on the block,” the Journal states, referring to Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein, the Post’s lead reporters on America’s greatest political scandal.

While it may make for a catchy “lede” (journalese for a story’s opening paragraph), the reference to the reporters who “took down a president” is wrong-headed: It’s a media myth that simplifies and distorts the forces and factors that led Nixon to quit in disgrace.

Even principals at the Post — Woodward among them — have asserted over the years that the newspaper did not bring down Nixon’s corrupt presidency. And they weren’t indulging in false modesty in saying so. (Ben Bradlee, the Post’s executive editor during Watergate, once said, for example: “[I]t must be remembered that Nixon got Nixon. The Post didn’t get Nixon.”)

And as I write in my media-mythbusting book, Getting It Wrong, “to explain Watergate through the lens of the heroic-journalist is to abridge and misunderstand the scandal and to indulge in a particularly beguiling media-driven myth. The heroic-journalist interpretation minimizes the far more decisive forces that unraveled the scandal and forced Nixon from office.”

Those forces included special federal prosecutors, federal judges, both houses of Congress, the Supreme Court, as well as the Justice Department and the FBI.

“Even then,” I note in Getting It Wrong, “Nixon likely would have served out his term if not for the audiotape recordings he secretly made of most conversations in the Oval Office of the White House.

Nixon quits

‘Nixon got Nixon’

“Only when compelled by the Supreme Court did Nixon surrender those recordings, which captured him plotting the cover-up and authorizing payments of thousands of dollars in hush money.”

So why does the mediacentric heroic-journalist interpretation of Watergate live on? Why is it so tempting to invoke, as the Journal does today?

Explanations go well beyond a reporter’s need for a catchy lede.

An especially compelling reason for the myth’s tenacity is that it makes accessible and understandable the intricate scandal that was Watergate.

That complexity —the webs of lies, the deceit, and the criminality that characterized the Nixon White House; the multiple lines of investigation that slowly unwound the scandal, and the drama of a constitutional crisis — are not readily recalled these days.

The scandal that unfolded from 1972 to 1974 has become so distant that few Americans can accurately describe what took place.

What does stand out, though, is the heroic-journalist meme — the appealing if misleading notion that the tireless reporting of Woodward and Bernstein exposed the crimes of Watergate and brought Nixon down.

It’s history lite, history made simple.

The myth is endlessly reassuring for journalists, too, suggesting as it does that journalism can make a difference, can bring about dramatic change. As I point out in Getting It Wrong, “How the Post and its reporters uncovered Watergate is deeply ingrained in American journalism as one of the field’s most important and self-reverential stories.”

It’s also one of journalism’s self-sustaining tales, as the Wall Street Journal demonstrates quite well today.

WJC

Many thanks to Instapundit
Glenn Reynolds for linking to this post

More from Media Myth Alert:

  1. […] “THE NEWSROOM WHERE TWO REPORTERS TOOK DOWN A PRESIDENT?” Prof. Joseph Campbell busts a recurrent media myth. […]

    Instapundit » Blog Archive » “THE NEWSROOM WHERE TWO REPORTERS TOOK DOWN A PRESIDENT?” Prof. Joseph Campbell busts a recurrent m… 2 February 2013 at 8am

  2. […] Post last week said it may put the building up for sale, citing economic and operational […]

    Landmark status for WaPo building? Watergate reporting ought not be a factor « Media Myth Alert 6 February 2013 at 9am

  3. […] The ‘newsroom where two reporters took down a president’? Sure it was […]

    Runup to the Oscars: ‘Politically inspired movies’ and the myth of Watergate | Media Myth Alert 22 February 2013 at 2pm

  4. […] The ‘newsroom where two reporters took down a president’? Sure it was […]

    If Obama loses AP: Rush Limbaugh embraces media myths two days running | Media Myth Alert 26 February 2013 at 6pm

  5. […] The ‘newsroom where two reporters took down a president’? Sure it was […]

    Woodward ‘destroyed the Nixon presidency’: More dubious history from Rush Limbaugh | Media Myth Alert 1 March 2013 at 7am

  6. […] player” in Washington is speculative. What most interests Media Myth Alert was how the Watergate myth was blithely injected into the Fox News Sunday […]

    Both left, right embrace media myth about WaPo and Watergate | Media Myth Alert 8 April 2013 at 1pm

  7. […] The ‘newsroom where two reporters took down a president’? Sure it was […]

    ‘All the President’s Men Revisited’: A mediacentric rehash, with some insight | Media Myth Alert 22 April 2013 at 2pm

  9. […] The ‘newsroom where two reporters took down a president’? Sure it was […]

    The Nixon tapes: A pivotal Watergate story that WaPo missed | Media Myth Alert 14 July 2013 at 8am

  10. […] The ‘newsroom where two reporters took down a president’? Sure it was […]

    Good call: WaPo building no landmark | Media Myth Alert 19 September 2013 at 11am

  11. […] The ‘newsroom where two reporters took down a president’? Sure it was […]

    Editor’s little-noted memoir offers intriguing insight about WaPo’s Watergate reporters | Media Myth Alert 21 December 2013 at 6am

  12. […] inattentive editing, or a gradual inclination to embrace an interpretation of Watergate that is beguiling but misleading. It is an easy-to-remember, simplified version of the history of America’s […]

    WaPo now embracing the dominant myth of Watergate? | Media Myth Alert 22 July 2014 at 8pm

  13. […] trope is endlessly appealing to journalists and has become the most familiar storyline of Watergate. It is, after all, a handy proxy for […]

    Confronting the mythology of Watergate | Media Myth Alert 6 August 2014 at 12pm

  14. […] — guided by Woodward’s clandestine source, code-named “Deep Throat” — exposed the crimes of Watergate and brought down Richard Nixon’s corrupt presidency in […]

    Marking five years: The best of Media Myth Alert | Media Myth Alert 31 October 2014 at 12pm

  15. […] right: Woodward and Bernstein did not topple Nixon’s corrupt […]

    The hero-journalist trope: Watergate’s go-to mythical narrative | Media Myth Alert 23 October 2015 at 6pm

  16. […] The ‘newsroom where two reporters took down a president’? Sure it was […]

    Why is he biopic worthy? Movie planned about Watergate’s ‘Deep Throat’ source | Media Myth Alert 27 November 2015 at 7am

  17. […] The ‘newsroom where two reporters took down a president’? Sure it was […]

    WaPo move to new quarters stirs retelling of hero-journalist myth | Media Myth Alert 14 December 2015 at 10am

  18. […] The ‘newsroom where two reporters took down a president’? Sure it was […]

    NYTimes invokes Watergate myth in writeup about journalists and movies | Media Myth Alert 3 January 2016 at 2pm

  20. […] The ‘newsroom where two reporters took down a president’? Sure it was […]

    Why Trump-Russia is still not Watergate redux | Media Myth Alert 15 May 2017 at 8am

  21. […] conversations at the White House from 1971 to 1973. The existence of the tapes was disclosed not by Woodward and Bernstein but by a former White House official, Alexander Butterfield, in testimony before a U.S. Senate […]

    WaPo’s ‘myths about Watergate’ article ignores the scandal’s best-known mythical narrative | Media Myth Alert 22 May 2017 at 3pm

  22. […] The ‘newsroom where two reporters took down a president’? Sure it was […]

    WaPo media writer embraces Woodward-Bernstein Watergate myth | Media Myth Alert 7 October 2017 at 8am

  23. […] The ‘newsroom where two reporters took down a president’? Sure it was […]

    A week after the editorial solidarity stunt: Why nothing changed in Trump-press war | Media Myth Alert 21 August 2018 at 1pm

  24. […] The ‘newsroom where two reporters took down a president’? Sure it was […]

    Say, CJR: Never hurts to check your archives | Media Myth Alert 17 September 2018 at 7am

  25. […] The ‘newsroom where two reporters took down a president’? Sure it was […]

    Newspaper rant deplores ‘debasement of reality’ but invokes prominent media myth | Media Myth Alert 8 January 2019 at 8am

  26. […] The ‘newsroom where two reporters took down a president’? Sure it was […]

    More Watergate mythologizing: Woodward, Bernstein ‘let facts speak’ and Nixon fell | Media Myth Alert 21 August 2019 at 5pm

  27. […] The ‘newsroom where two reporters took down a president’? Sure it was […]

    Woodward’s latest Trump book prompts myth-telling about Watergate | Media Myth Alert 22 September 2020 at 7pm

  28. […] The ‘newsroom where two reporters took down a president’: Sure it was […]

    Watergate at 50: Why the ‘heroic-journalist’ myth still defines the scandal | Media Myth Alert 16 June 2022 at 8am

Comments are closed.