The heroic-journalist myth of Watergate — the notion that dogged reporting by Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein for the Washington Post brought down Richard Nixon’s corrupt presidency — pops up often, and in the service of any number of objectives.

Nixon got Nixon
It is a tale of supposed high accomplishment inspiring to journalists, especially so at a time of sustained retrenchment in their field.
It’s a trope with the intoxicating effect of placing journalists at the decisive center of an exceptional moment in U.S. history.
And it’s a way of paying obsequious tribute to the Washington Post, much as Sky News in Britain did not long ago.
“The Washington Post is one of the world’s great newspapers,” a fawning essay at the Sky’s online site declared, adding:
“Thanks to its investigative reporters Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein, it can make the unique claim of having brought down an American president — the corrupt Richard Nixon.”
It’s not too difficult to understand why such an extravagant claim circulates so widely.
After all, it is tidy, handy if terribly misleading shorthand about the sprawling Watergate scandal of 1972-74: It sweeps away complexities of Watergate, rendering the scandal and its thicket of lies and criminality rather easy to grasp. After all, as I noted in the recently published, expanded second edition of my mythbusting book, Getting It Wrong, the Watergate scandal “has grown so distant that few Americans can accurately describe what took place.”
The heroic-journalist myth has become a reductive substitute.
The heroic-journalist interpretation also is a way of saluting Woodward and Bernstein, both of whom are in their 70s. Both, in fact, will highlight this weekend’s White House Correspondents’ Association dinner, where they are to hand out awards and offer remarks about the importance of investigative reporting. (Not surprisingly, their pending joint appearance has stirred fresh retelling of the heroic-journalist myth. The Washington Examiner said the other day, for instance, that Woodward and Bernstein’s “coverage of the Watergate break-in led eventually to former President Richard Nixon’s resignation.”)
In their younger days, Woodward and Bernstein sneered at the correspondents’ association dinner, describing it in All the President’s Men, their 1974 book about Watergate, as “a formal, overdone, alcohol-saturated event, attended by all those with power — or pretensions to power — in the media and government.” Woodward and Bernstein went anyway, in 1973, to collect a couple of prizes.
So over-the-top is the heroic-journalist interpretation of Watergate that not even principals at the Post when the scandal played out — notably the publisher, Katharine Graham, and her top editor, Ben Bradlee — embraced the notion.
“Sometimes people accuse us of bringing down a president, which of course we didn’t do,” Graham said in 1997. “The processes that caused [Nixon’s] resignation were constitutional.”
Also that year, Bradlee said on the Sunday talk show “Meet the Press” that “it must be remembered that Nixon got Nixon. The Post didn’t get Nixon.”
He was referring to the White House audio tapes which Nixon secretly made and which revealed the president’s guilty role in attempting to divert the FBI investigation into the botched burglary of Democratic National Committee headquarters in Washington in June 1972. The breakin touched off the scandal.
And in earthier terms, Woodward concurred, telling an interviewer in 2006:
“To say that the press brought down Nixon, that’s horseshit.”
Quite.
More from Media Myth Alert:
- NYTimes invokes Watergate myth in writeup about journalists and movies
- NYTimes mag and the heroic-journalist myth of Watergate
- A trope that knows few bounds: The hero-journalist interpretation of Watergate
- Watergate made boring
- The Watergate myth that offers something for everyone
- Misreporting Watergate
- Didn’t: A Watergate primer
- ‘Deep Throat’ garage marker errs about Watergate source disclosure
- Mythmaking in Moscow: Biden says WaPo brought down Nixon
- Inspirations to journalists: Woodward, Bernstein — and Gaga?
- WaPo ‘broke the Watergate scandal’? No way
- WaPo ‘played pivotal role’ in Watergate? Think again
- Mythmaking in Moscow: Biden says WaPo brought down Nixon
- Every good historian a mythbuster
- ‘Getting It Wrong’ wins SPJ award for Research about Journalism
