W. Joseph Campbell

Lynch says she could’ve embraced Post’s phony hero story

In Debunking, Jessica Lynch, Media myths, Washington Post on November 15, 2010 at 6:55 am

Jessica Lynch was back on the air the other day, doing a television interview that brought more muddle than clarity to the erroneous reporting about her battlefield heroics early in the Iraq War.

Lynch said on CNN’s HLN show that she could have embraced the storyline that said she fought like a female Rambo–and no one would have been the wiser if she had. No one “would have known,” she asserted.

The notion Lynch was a wartime hero, that she had fought like Rambo, was thrust into the public domain by the Washington Post in a botched, front-page story published April 3, 2003. The Post described how Lynch supposedly was fighting to the death in the ambush of her unit in Nasiriyah, Iraq.

The Post also said in its sensational yet thinly sourced  report that Lynch had been shot and stabbed before being overwhelmed and taken prisoner.

The Post published the article beneath the headline: “‘She was fighting to the death.’”

But as I discuss in my latest book, Getting It Wrong, none of that was true: Lynch had not fired a shot in the ambush; her weapon had jammed. She was neither shot nor stabbed.

She did suffer shattering injuries in the crash of a Humvee as it tried to flee the ambush. But Lynch was no battlefield hero.

She was taken prisoner and kept in an Iraqi hospital where she lingered near death until a U.S. special forces team rescued her on April 1, 2003.

On HLN, Lynch said she agreed with interviewer Joy Behar’s suggestion that she could have claimed the hero’s mantle.

“Absolutely,” Lynch said, “because nobody would have known. I mean, everyone in my vehicle was killed that day. So I was the only survivor out of the five of us.

“I mean, so it would have been very easy to take credit for everything.”

However, as I’ve noted previously, embracing the false hero-warrior storyline would have been untenable for Lynch.

The colonel commanding the Army hospital at Landstuhl, Germany, where Lynch was treated after her rescue, told journalists the day after the Post published its hero-warrior story that Lynch had been neither shot nor stabbed.

He thus undercut a crucial element of the hero-warrior tale–that Lynch had been shot and stabbed, but had kept fighting. That central component of the narrative was quickly exposed as untrue.

Moreover, it became apparent in the weeks after the Post‘s story that there had been a real hero at Nasiriyah, that the battlefield derring-do initially attributed to Lynch probably were the deeds of Sergeant Donald Walters, a cook in Lynch’s unit.

Walters either was left behind or stayed behind during the confusion of the ambush. He laid down covering fire as he fellow soldiers sought to escape.

After running out of ammunition, Walters was captured by Iraqi irregulars, and executed. His body when exhumed bore stab and gunshot wounds.

It’s curious–indeed, in my view inexcusable–that Lynch almost never refers to Walters. She didn’t mention his name in the interview with HLN.

It’s curious, too, that interviews with Lynch never bring up the Washington Post and its singular role in propelling the Lynch case into the public domain. HLN’s Behar certainly didn’t mention the Post and its phony hero-warrior story.

WJC

Recent and related:

  1. […] Lynch says she could’ve embraced Post’s phony hero story […]

  2. […] astonishment at Media Myth Alert from time to time about how the national spotlight still finds Jessica Lynch, who became the most familiar face of the early Iraq War because of a botched, front page story in […]

  3. […] Lynch says she could’ve embraced Post’s phony hero story […]

  4. […] case into the public domain. The Post, I’ve argued, ought to disclose the sources for its electrifying but bogus story about Lynch’s supposed battlefield heroics in […]

  5. […] southern Iraq, an engagement so poorly reported by the Washington Post that it catapulted Jessica Lynch to undeserved international fame – and obscured the heroism of an Army sergeant who was captured, […]

  6. […] tale of Lynch’s heroics turned out to be utterly false, a case of apparent mistaken identity. Although the Post never […]

  7. […] Lynch says she could’ve embraced Post’s phony hero story […]

  8. […] Lynch says she could’ve embraced Post’s phony hero story […]

  9. […] Lynch says she could’ve embraced Post’s phony hero story […]

  10. […] Lynch says she could’ve embraced Post’s phony hero story […]

  11. […] Lynch says she could’ve embraced Post’s phony hero story […]

  12. […] is remarkable how often Jessica Lynch pops up in media reports, even though eight years have passed since the bogus story about her […]

  13. […] Lynch says she could’ve embraced Post’s phony hero story […]

  14. […] claims in a 2009 book that a former White House official, Jim Wilkinson, was the source for the Washington Post’s botched report about Jessica Lynch and her supposed battlefield heroics early in the Iraq […]

  15. […] Lynch says she could’ve embraced WaPo’s phony hero story […]

  16. […] claimed — without attribution — that Wilkinson was the Post’s source on the Lynch story. Krakauer asserted that Wilkinson was  “a master propagandist” and “the guy who […]

  17. […] What, then, explains the persistence of the false narrative that military concocted the hero-warrior tale about Lynch? […]

  18. […] Lynch says she could have embraced Post’s phony hero story […]

  19. […] ignored the singular role of the Washington Post in placing the hero-warrior tale about Lynch into the public […]

  20. […] Lynch herself insists, she was no hero (although she has said she could have embraced the hero-warrior tale and no one would’ve been […]

  21. […] Lynch herself insists, she was no hero (although she has said she could have embraced the hero-warrior tale and no one would’ve been […]

  22. […] Lynch says she could’ve embraced Post’s phony hero story […]

  23. […] Lynch says she could’ve embraced Post’s phony hero story […]

  24. […] Lynch herself insists, she was no hero (although she has said she could have embraced the Post’s hero-warrior tale and no one would’ve been the […]

  25. […] report about an Iraqi lawyer who helped set in motion the rescue from captivity of Jessica Lynch, a wounded, 19-year-old Army […]

  26. […] story was picked up by news organizations around the world and made Lynch — who never embraced the story — a household name in […]

  27. […] Lynch herself insists, she was no hero (although she has said she could have embraced the Post’s hero-warrior tale and no one would’ve been the […]

  28. […] months later that Walters most likely performed the battlefield heroics misattributed to Lynch, who never embraced the Post’s […]

  29. […] Lynch was a 19-year-old Army private whom the Post catapulted to international fame in a story in April 2003 that claimed she fought fiercely in an ambush in Iraq, firing at her attackers despite being shot and stabbed and seeing comrades “die around her.” Lynch was taken prisoner, the Post, reported, only after running out of ammunition. […]

  30. […] — without citing supporting evidence — that the  Pentagon concocted the story about Lynch. In January, for example, London’s Independent newspaper declared “the Pentagon […]

  31. […] Lynch says she could’ve embraced Post’s phony hero story […]

  32. […] southern Iraq, an engagement so poorly reported by the Washington Post that it catapulted Jessica Lynch to undeserved international fame – and obscured the heroism of an Army sergeant who was captured, […]

  33. […] has long insisted she was no hero — although she has said she could have embraced the bogus hero-warrior tale and no one would’ve been the […]

  34. […] or take much responsibility for its deeply erroneous reporting about Pfc. Jessica Lynch’s purported heroics early in the Iraq […]

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: