W. Joseph Campbell

, , , , , , ,

‘You might bring down a government’: Sure, that happens

In Cinematic treatments, Debunking, Media myths, Washington Post, Watergate myth on December 11, 2010 at 7:49 am

From time to time, the Washington Post has sought to dismiss the notion that its Watergate reporting was decisive in bringing down the corrupt presidency of Richard Nixon.

Not the Post's work

In 1997, at the 25th anniversary of the break-in at Democratic headquarters–the scandal’s seminal crime–the newspaper’s publisher during the Watergate period, Katharine Graham, insisted it was not the Post that toppled Nixon.

“Sometimes people accuse us of bringing down a president, which of course we didn’t do,” she said on that occasion. “The processes that caused [Nixon’s] resignation were constitutional.”

In 2005, Michael Getler, then the newspaper’s ombudsman, wrote in a column: “Ultimately, it was not The Post, but the FBI, a Congress acting in bipartisan fashion and the courts that brought down the Nixon administration.”

Still, the notion that the Post was decisive in Wategate’s outcome pops up occasionally. Political writer Dana Milbank, for example, referred in a column early this year to how the newspaper “took down a president.”

And yesterday, a blog item at the Post online site asserted that the newspaper’s Watergate reporters, Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein, had brought Nixon down. (Update: The item, an essay, was published Sunday, December 11, in the book section of the Post.)

The essay praised the cinematic version of Woodward and Bernstein’s book, All the President’s Men, and stated:

“I just re-watched ‘All the President’s Men,’ which I do every year or so, and, every time, I marvel at how interesting Woodward and Bernstein’s lives were at The Post, and how well the film explains the reporting process, its doggedness and randomness, and how great an excuse it is to get out in the world and ask every seemingly obvious question you can think of (What books did the man check out?), because you never know, you might bring down a government that has it coming.

“When I watch that movie,” the writer added, “I also think about how mundane my own ‘writing life’ can be.”

As it often is for journalists.

But to write “bring down a government that has it coming” — that’s to indulge in a media-driven myth, the beguiling heroic-journalist myth of Watergate.

As I note in my latest book, Getting It Wrong:

“The heroic-journalist interpretation minimizes the far more decisive forces that unraveled the scandal and forced Nixon from office” in 1974.

Even so, that interpretation has become the dominant popular narrative of Watergate–a David vs. Goliath storyline in which the courageous reporting of Woodward and Bernstein exposed the crimes of the Nixon administration.

The movie All the President’s Men is a central reason the heroic-journalist trope lives on.

All the President’s Men, which starred Robert Redford as Woodward and Dustin Hoffman as Bernstein, was released in April 1976, as the wounds of Watergate had slowly begun to close.

“The movie,” I write in Getting It Wrong, “suggested their reporting was more hazardous than it was, that by digging into Watergate, Woodward and Bernstein exposed themselves to not insignificant risk and peril.

“To an extent far greater than the book, the cinematic version of All the President’s Men placed Woodward and Bernstein at the center of Watergate’s unraveling while denigrating the efforts of investigative agencies such as the FBI.”

The effect, I add, “was to solidify and elevate the heroic-journalist myth, giving it dramatic power, and sustaining it in the collective memory.”

And it has become a particularly tenacious and defining media-driven myth.

WJC

Recent and related:

My thanks to Jim Romenesko for linking to this post.

  1. […] What’s of particular interest to Media Myth Alert is the casual and erroneous reference to “the advice” the stealthy anonymous source “Deep Throat” offered Woodward of the Washington Post during the newspaper’s Watergate investigation. […]

    ‘Follow the tenspot’ « Media Myth Alert 12 December 2010 at 10am

  2. […] In the fallout from the Wikileaks disclosure of 25o,000 U.S. diplomatic cables, commentators seeking a point of reference sometimes have turned to what I call the heroic-journalist myth of Watergate. […]

    ‘Spiegel’ thumbsucker invokes Watergate myth « Media Myth Alert 14 December 2010 at 10am

  3. […] ‘You might bring down a government’: Sure, that happens […]

    As inevitable as ‘Yes, Virginia,’ at the holidays « Media Myth Alert 15 December 2010 at 9am

  4. […] as I point out in my latest book, Getting It Wrong, not even the Post buys that interpretation. Plus, I note in debunking the […]

    Watergate and its hardy myths « Media Myth Alert 16 December 2010 at 1pm

  5. […] ‘You might bring down a government’: Sure, that happens […]

    Knocking down the ‘Cronkite Moment’ « Media Myth Alert 22 December 2010 at 9am

  7. […] The screenwriter William Goldman has taken credit for writing the line into the script of All the President’s Men, the cinematic version of Woodward and Carl Bernstein’s book about their Watergate reporting. […]

    ‘Follow the money’ and the ‘new blue bloods’ in Parliament « Media Myth Alert 12 February 2011 at 10am

  8. […] quoted me as saying that against the backdrop of subpoena-wielding authorities who dug into the crimes of Watergate, “the contributions of The Washington Post really recede into near […]

    ‘So to Speak’ about ‘Getting It Wrong’ « Media Myth Alert 18 March 2011 at 6am

  10. […] investigative reporting of the Watergate scandal exposed the corruption of Richard Nixon and forced his resignation in disgrace in […]

    That’s rich: Woodward bemoans celebrity journalism « Media Myth Alert 24 April 2011 at 11am

  11. […] does not appear in Woodward and Bernstein’s book, which came out in June 1974, just as the Watergate scandal was nearing its denouement with Nixon’s […]

    A ‘follow the money’ hat trick « Media Myth Alert 14 May 2011 at 9am

  12. […] Post is an important reason why many people erroneously believe that Woodward and Bernstein brought down Richard Nixon’s corrupt […]

    Why history is badly taught, poorly learned « Media Myth Alert 19 June 2011 at 12pm

  13. […] ‘You might bring down a government’: Sure, that happens […]

    No ‘rock-em,’ no ‘sock-em’: What ails WaPo « Media Myth Alert 7 August 2011 at 12pm

  14. […] resignation, to direct attention to the myth and hyperbole that embrace the best-known line of the Watergate scandal, the line that supposedly helped bring him […]

    Following the money on 37th anniversary of Nixon’s fall « Media Myth Alert 9 August 2011 at 12am

  15. […] ‘You might bring down a government’: Sure, that happens […]

    60 years after his death, media myth towers around Hearst « Media Myth Alert 15 August 2011 at 4am

  16. […] to his own suspect conduct as a Washington Post reporter covering Watergate, the scandal that brought down Richard Nixon’s corrupt presidency in […]

    Carl Bernstein, at it again « Media Myth Alert 1 October 2011 at 11am

  18. […] proxies as they would surely have reflected heightened interest in careers in the profession. If Watergate and All the President’s Men inspired broad interest in careers in journalism, evidence of the […]

    The media myths of Watergate: Part Five « Media Myth Alert 21 June 2012 at 6am

  23. […] Bringing down Nixon wasn’t the Post’s […]

    No, Politico: WaPo didn’t bring down Nixon | Media Myth Alert 27 May 2015 at 5pm

  25. […] ‘You might bring down a government’: Sure, that happens […]

    Why Trump-Russia is hardly Nixon-Watergate | Media Myth Alert 5 March 2017 at 10am

  26. […] ‘You might bring down a government’: Sure, that happens […]

    Why Trump-Russia is still not Watergate redux | Media Myth Alert 15 May 2017 at 8am

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: