A passage in a recent essay at a Washington Post blog demonstrates just how insidious the notion is that the military made up the hero-warrior tale about Army private Jessica Lynch in the early days of the Iraq War.
The Post’s higher education blog, “College Inc.,” cited “the fabrication of the story of Jessica Lynch” as an example of “a serious problem in the military’s relationship with the civilian world.” (The essay discussed what the author called the “shrill insistence by the military on its own virtue.”)
Lynch in 2003
The author, a Naval Academy professor named Bruce Fleming, also invoked the case of Pat Tillman — an Army Ranger killed slain by friendly fire in Afghanistan — in asserting:
“This is lying to the people the military is meant to protect, and who pay for it. It is absolutely, completely, unacceptable. Yet it now has become common.”
Strong stuff.
But it’s exceedingly the top in the case of Jessica Lynch: The claim that the military made up the tale of her battlefield heroics is seriously misstated. And more than faintly ironic, given that it was the Washington Post that reported Lynch had “gone down firing,” that she had fought ferociously in the ambush of her unit, the 507th Maintenance Company, in southern Iraq in March 2003.
It was the Post — citing otherwise anonymous “U.S. officials” — that claimed Lynch had “shot several enemy soldiers” in the ambush.
It was the Post that said Lynch “continued firing at the Iraqis even after she sustained multiple gunshot wounds and watched several other soldiers in her unit die around her” in the fighting.
It was the Post that placed the electrifying heroic-warrior tale about Lynch on its front page of April 3, 2003, beneath a headline that read:
“‘She was fighting to the death.'”
It was the Post — alone — that placed the story into the public domain.
And none of it was true.
Lynch was neither shot nor stabbed. She suffered shattering injuries in the crash of a Humvee as it attempted to flight the ambush. But she fired not a shot in the attack.
Lynch was taken prisoner, but rescued nine days later from an Iraqi hospital by U.S. special forces.
The Post for its part has never fully explained how it got so utterly wrong a story that was picked up by news organizations around the world, turning the unsuspecting Lynch into the best-known Army private of the war.
However, as I point out in my latest book, Getting It Wrong, we know from one of the Post reporters on the Lynch story that the military wasn’t pushing the hero-warrior story.
That reporter, Vernon Loeb, said in an interview on NPR’s Fresh Air program in December 2003:
“Our sources for that story were not Pentagon sources.”
He also said in the interview:
“They wouldn’t say anything about Jessica Lynch.”
Loeb added:
“I just didn’t see the Pentagon trying to create a hero where there was none. I mean …they never showed any interest in doing that, to me.”
On another occasion, Loeb was quoted in a commentary in the New York Times as saying:
“Far from promoting stories about Lynch, the military didn’t like the story.”
The author of the Times commentary was Mark Bowden, who wrote the critically acclaimed Black Hawk Down, a book about the failed U.S. military mission in Somalia in 1998 1993. Of the Lynch case, Bowden said in his commentary:
“There is no doubt that the American media took these bits and pieces from the fog of war and assembled them into a heroic tale. … This is how the media works today, for better or worse. It happens without any prompting from the Pentagon.”
What, then, explains the persistence of the false narrative that military concocted the hero-warrior tale about Lynch?
Part of the answer lies in a dim understanding about the military and its ways. Few Americans have much first-hand knowledge about the armed services and warfare. Such limited familiarity can lead to the embrace of flawed narratives and misleading caricatures.
The Post’s erroneous account of Lynch as a female Rambo pouring lead into attacking Iraqis was cinematic — and more than vaguely reminiscent of scenes in the 1996 motion picture Courage Under Fire.
Another part of the answer lies in the news media’s tendency to shift blame away from major mistakes. As media critic Jack Shafer has pointed out:
“The rotten truth is that media organizations are better at correcting trivial errors of fact — proper spellings of last names, for example — than they are at fixing a botched story.”
The false narrative that the military concocted the Lynch tale has enabled the Post to dodge accountability for a botched story still oozes venom, suspicion, and misunderstanding.
The newspaper’s unwillingness to set the record straight by identifying the sources that led it awry has given rise to false claims, including those about the military’s “fabrication.”
Many thanks to Instapundit Glenn Reynolds, and to smalldeadanimals.com and Blackfive.net, for linking to this post.
Recent and related:
- The debunking of the year, 2011
- Lynch blames ‘military, media’ for bogus hero story, ignores WaPo
- Lynch heroics not ‘the Pentagon’s story’; it was WaPo’s
- No ‘rock-em,’ no ‘sock-em’: What ails WaPo
- WaPo eludes responsibility in bogus hero-warrior tale about Lynch
- Jon Krakauer rolls back claims about WaPo ‘source’ in Lynch case
- Recalling the hero of Nasiriyah: It wasn’t Jessica Lynch
- False narrative about Jessica Lynch and Pentagon surfaces anew
- ‘A debunker’s work is never done’
- ‘Getting It Wrong’ goes on Q-and-A
Media Myth Alert 
[…] so-called “Cronkite Moment” of 1968, and the battlefield derring-do misattributed to Jessica Lynch early in the Iraq […]
[…] as well as its unwillingness to identify the sources who led it astray, have given rise to the tenacious false narrative that the military ginned up the story to bolster support for the […]
[…] Fox News afternoon program yesterday and indulged in the notion that “the government” deviously made up the tale about Lynch’s battlefield heroics early in the Iraq War. […]
[…] Myth Alert last week in discussing Smith’s comments, the inclination by commentators on the political left and the right has been to overlook the journalistic origins of the bogus hero-warrior tale about […]
[…] in regard to Jessica Lynch, it’s not even factual. As W. Joseph Campbell explains, the Jessica Lynch story was fabricated, not by the military, but by the Washington […]
[…] private thrust into an international spotlight by a newspaper’s botched report about her battlefield heroics in Iraq in March […]
[…] is the ninth anniversary of the Washington Post‘s stunningly wrong hero-warrior tale about Jessica Lynch, a botched report published on its front page beneath the […]
[…] The military’s ‘fabrication’? No, Jessica Lynch was WaPo’s story […]
[…] explain this apparent inconsistency?” In other words, is the Post too embarrassed by its botched reporting about Lynch to make the links freely available […]
[…] it turned out that the Post’s hero-warrior tale about Lynch was embarrassingly wrong in all important details. Lynch never fired […]
[…] I’ve noted many times at Media Myth Alert, the Pentagon wasn’t the source for the bogus tale about Lynch’s […]
[…] soon it became apparent that the Post’s hero-warrior story was utterly wrong in all important details. Lynch never fired a shot in Iraq; […]
[…] The military’s ‘fabrication’? No, Jessica Lynch was WaPo’s story […]
[…] The military’s ‘fabrication’? No, Jessica Lynch was WaPo’s story […]
[…] The military’s ‘fabrication’? No, Jessica Lynch was WaPo’s story […]
[…] whose purported battlefield heroics in Iraq proved to be a wild exaggeration by the Washington Post, told a Virginia television station the other […]
[…] The military’s ‘fabrication’? No, Jessica Lynch was WaPo’s story […]
[…] The military’s ‘fabrication’? No, Jessica Lynch was WaPo’s story […]
[…] The military’s ‘fabrication’? No, Jessica Lynch was WaPo’s story […]
[…] cited no source for her claim, offered as she revisited at some length the hero-warrior tale about Lynch, an Army supply clerk thrust into international fame on April 3, 2003, in an […]
[…] The military’s ‘fabrication’? No, Jessica Lynch was WaPo’s story […]
[…] The military’s ‘fabrication’? No, Jessica Lynch was WaPo’s story […]
[…] its credit, the Washington Post over the years has mostly declined to embrace the dominant media myth about the Watergate scandal, […]
[…] offered no sourcing for her claim, made while revisiting at some length the hero-warrior tale about Lynch, an Army supply clerk thrust into international fame on April 3, 2003, in an […]
[…] newspaper that brought us the bogus story about the battlefield heroics of Jessica Lynch during the Iraq War has goofed again in recounting […]
[…] The military’s ‘fabrication’? No, Jessica Lynch was WaPo’s story […]
[…] Post’s blunder appeared in a review posted yesterday of The True Flag, a new book about America’s emergence […]
[…] The military’s fabrication? No, Jessica Lynch was WaPo’s story […]
[…] the ever-enticing notion that dogged reporting by Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein for the Washington Post uncovered evidence that brought down Richard Nixon’s corrupt presidency. It’s a myth […]